How do the Regulations affect you?
- Product Stewardship Act
- Product Stewardship (Televisions and Computers Regulations – 2011
- Liable Parties
- Co-Regulatory Arrangements
- Guide for Local Government
- Role of Recyclers in the Scheme
What is an Approved Arrangement?
Under the Regulations, television, computer and computer product importers and local manufacturers will meet their obligations by becoming a member of an approved arrangement that collects and recycles waste television and computer products on their behalf. For the arrangement to be approved, the administrator must apply to the Minister or his/her delegate for approval.
Who funds the collection and recycling?
What about legacy systems, orphans, and “white box” products?
How does this scheme compare with those operating overseas?
In particular the “waste arising” approach where liable parties pay on the basis of the actual waste that is collected rather than a fixed fee for every product sold was considered to be fair and efficient. Each Liable Party will pay for their share of the waste according to their current market share of imports and manufacturing.
Why did the Regulator adopt a co-regulatory model?
Are business products covered too?
What are the conversion factors and where did they come from?
As customs data is only available in units of product and because recycled waste is measured in weight (tonnes) it was necessary to convert the units to weight. The conversion factors were developed by the government based on information provided by importers on the total number of units and their actual weight imported over the past 3 years.
They will be regularly reviewed under the legislation.
In some product classes, a range of products that are very heavy and others that are very light are included. Industry has made a submission to the government to review some of the tariff codes so that like-weight products can be classified together.
If I am a Liable Party how much will I have to pay?
Adapted from information provided in Liable Party Letter from Government
|
Tariff Classification no./stat. code |
Applicable
Threshold |
Number
of Products (Units) Imported in 2010-2011 |
Conversion
Factor Kg/unit |
Converted
Weight of Products (kg) |
|
8443.31.00.61 |
Computers
& Printers |
300,000 |
8.7 |
2,610,000 |
|
8473.30.00.70 |
Computer Products |
250,0000 |
1 |
250,000 |
|
8528.72.00.16 |
Televisions |
200,000 |
30.1 |
6,020,000 |
Sample Table 3: Totals of Converted Weight by Product Class in Liable Parties Letter from Government
|
Product Class |
Liable
based on own imports? |
Total
Converted Weight (kg) |
|
Televisions
|
Yes |
6,020,000 |
|
Computers
Printers & Computer Products |
Yes |
2,860,000 |
Government Calculation of Total Waste Arising for 2010/11 was as follows:
(Note this information has been provided by the government but is not included in the Liable Parties letter*)
|
Product Class |
Total
Imports for 2010/2011 (Tonnes) |
Your
Market Share
* |
Total
Estimated Available Waste for 2010/2011** (Tonnes) |
First
Year Target (30% of available waste for both product classes) (Tonnes) |
|
Computers, Printers and Computer Products |
91,000 |
3% |
84,144 |
25,000 |
|
Televisions |
70,000 |
8.6% |
66,315 |
20,000 |
Calculation of your Market Share
|
Product Class |
Total
Converted Weight of the products that you imported (from Table 2) |
Total
Weight Arising Nationally (from Table 3) |
Your
Market Share (Column 1 ÷ Column2 ) |
Your
Share of the First Year Target (Your share x Target from Table 3) |
|
|
Column1 |
Column 2 |
Column 3 |
Column 4 |
|
Computers, Printers and Computer Products |
2,860,000 Kg 2,860 Tonnes |
84,144 Tonnes |
3 % |
750
Tonnes |
|
Televisions |
6,020,000
Kg 6,020
Tonnes |
66,315
Tonnes |
9% |
1800 Tonnes |
Please note that this is an example only to allow you to estimate your market share. The real data for the first year’s targets ie total waste arising estimated by the government will not be available until September 2012, when actual unit imports for the Fiscal year have been reported by Customs and ABS.
If you would like assistance in calculating you market share please contact us.
Note that liable parties will not be paying the government directly, they will be paying the Approved Arrangement they join. The Arrangement will charge its members (liable parties) as outlined below. If you are a Liable Party then you must join an Approved Arrangement or set up your own. The Government requires the Approved Arrangement to recycle e-waste equating to the total market share of its members in each product class. The way that the Arrangement charges Liable Parties is up to each Arrangement.
Some of my Products are imported and then exported again
What about products that are exported for re-use?
ANZRP - by industry for industry
ANZRP Pricing Strategy
- The cost per tonne will be based on the best market rates available while ensuring compliance with legal and social obligations
- It is likely that there will be different charges for different product types due to the different costs for recycling different product types
- Importers who service the Commercial sector only (B to B) will continue to operate their existing commercial take back arrangements and will report their contribution towards their target through ANZRP. There will be a small fee for this service
- Due to the fact that it is a non profit member-based company there will be continual scrutiny of costs and an ongoing determination to find ongoing efficiencies and cost reduction.
When will I have to start paying?
ANZRP will take advantage of the option in the regulation to count products recycled from 8 November 2011 towards the first year’s target. This means that progression towards the target can be smoothed somewhat and valuable information will be gained in the early start up phase that will allow understanding and management of volumes as the program is rolled out nationally. Some Liable Parties may choose to participate in this early phase.
ANZRP Product Stewardship Program -
Competitive Collection and RecyclingUnder the ANZRP model there are a number of approved transport providers and recyclers. This means that the service can be tailored depending on the collection and recycling locations to provide the best cost/service/carbon outcome
Flexible Collection ServicesThe program will combine fixed collection services (starting with established sites), and regular e-waste events. This will allow flexibility to meet demand where it is needed and to control volumes during the early phase to avoid overwhelming collectors and recyclers and to spread costs for Liable Parties.
Approved Collectors and Recyclers – Safeguarding your reputationE-waste Collectors and Recyclers under the ANZRP co-regulatory arrangement will have to meet the requirements of the Interim Industry Standard (IIS) for Collection, Transport and Recycling of End of Life Televisions and Computers. A copy of the IIS is available on the ANZRP web site anzrp.com.au. The purpose of the Standard is to ensure that all parties involved are complying with their legal obligations for the management of health, safety and environmental risks. The standard also requires that Recyclers audit their downstream suppliers and provide evidence that all e-waste and its broken down components are disposed of legally and safely. For Recyclers, compliance will involve an initial audit of all approved sites by a third party with ongoing surveillance audits.
Product Re-useUnder the waste hierarchy (avoid, re-use, recycle) product re-use should be preferred over recycling. ANZRP and IAG will be working with local government, NGOs such as Planet Ark and Charities to ensure that information is available to consumers about which products are suitable for re-use and advising which existing channels are in place to handle those products. The aim is to divert working product, for which there is a market, to the appropriate channels before it is disposed of at end of life.
Once product is disposed of at an ANZRP approved site it will be recycled in accordance with the Interim Industry Standard and auditable records maintained of how the components are disposed of. This is to avoid the illegal international trade in e-waste. It is well documented that much product which is apparently legally sold as working product ends up as e-waste in third world countries where it is recycled in ways that are extremely damaging to the people involved and the local environment. |